Developing Digital Instructional Materials via Design-Based Research: A Case Study of Critical Literacy Skills Among Undergraduate EFL Students

Authors

  • Inda Indrawati Author
  • Moh. Fauzan Author

Keywords:

Critical Literacy, Design-Based Research, Digital Instructional Materials, Multimodal Reading, Tertiary EFL

Abstract

While digital media consumption has proliferated in higher education, undergraduate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students in regional contexts often struggle to engage critically with online multimodal texts. Addressing this gap, this study employed a Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology to design, iteratively refine, and evaluate web-based instructional materials (CriticaRead) aimed at fostering critical literacy skills among EFL undergraduates. Conducted at Universitas Madako Tolitoli, Central Sulawesi, the research followed three systematic DBR phases—Analysis/Exploration, Design/Construction, and Evaluation/Reflection—involving 32 undergraduate EFL students and four expert evaluators. The materials were structured around Luke and Freebody's Four Resources Model. Quantitative data from expert validation rubrics and qualitative data from classroom observations, artifacts, and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were analyzed using descriptive statistics and reflexive thematic analysis. Findings revealed that iterative DBR refinements elevated material validity from an initial mean score of 3.18 (79.5%) to 3.65 (91.25%). Furthermore, classroom implementation demonstrated a qualitative shift in students' reading stances, progressing from passive comprehension to active deconstruction of authorial bias, multimodal framing, and omitted perspectives. This study highlights the value of scaffolded digital materials in democratizing critical pedagogy within regional tertiary EFL settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2023). Beyond functional digital literacy: Fostering critical digital citizenship in tertiary EFL education. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100142

Albeckay, M. (2024). Assessing critical reading strategies among EFL undergraduate students: Gaps and pedagogical implications. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 20(1), 88–104.

Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2024). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Using design-based research to develop digital learning environments for language learners: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 39, 100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100521

Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2019). English in the digital age: Information and communications technology (ICT) in second language teaching. Routledge.

Huang, L., & Abdullah, N. (2023). Critical literacy practices in Asian EFL contexts: A synthesis of empirical studies. System, 112, 102965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102965

Janks, H. (2014). Critical literacy in teaching and research. Education Inquiry, 5(1), 24244. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v5.24244

Kniaz, O., Bondar, I., & Shevchenko, V. (2024). Commercial digital platforms in ELT: Usability versus critical cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(3), 1102–1118.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Lau, S. M. C. (2020). Critical literacy in English language teaching: Exploring possibilities and challenges. System, 90, 102220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102220

Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further notes on the four resources model. Reading Online, 3(1), 1–5.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2021). Educational design research: Portraying, theoretical and practical contributions. Open Education Studies, 3(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2020-0140

Pham, T. H., & Nguyen, T. M. (2024). Applying Design-Based Research in tertiary EFL course design: Challenges and opportunities. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(2), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2241201

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction and illustrative cases. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).

Reeves, T. C., & Lin, L. (2020). The research we have is not the research we need: Educational design research as an alternative. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09811-3

Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where are we going? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154.

Sultana, N., Chowdhury, R., & Hamid, M. O. (2023). Digital literacy and critical thinking in higher education ELT: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(6), 512–528.

Thorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2023). Digital technology and second language development. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719052300005X

Vasquez, V. M., Janks, H., & Comber, B. (2019). Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Language Arts, 96(5), 300–311.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

Indrawati, I., & Moh. Fauzan. (2026). Developing Digital Instructional Materials via Design-Based Research: A Case Study of Critical Literacy Skills Among Undergraduate EFL Students. TINOMBALA: Journal of Language Education and Social Sciences, 1(2), 62-72. https://journal.topaz.or.id/index.php/tinombala/article/view/7